25 01 2011

127 Hours. Production Companies!

127 Hours, a new release from the director of Danny Boyle, also the director of Award Winners such as Slumdog Millionaire and Trainspotting.

Budget:

$18,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$264,851 (USA) (7 November 2010) (4 Screens)

Gross:

$11,124,119 (USA) (16 January 2011)

 

Production Companies

Pathe

Founded as Société Pathé Frères (Pathé Brothers Company) in Paris, France on 28 September 1896 by brothers Charles, Emile, Theophile and Jacques Pathe , during the first part of the 20th century, Pathé became the largest film equipment and production company in the world as well as a major producer of phonograph records.

Film 4

Film4 did not originally focus on broadcasting blockbusters, but nowadays broadcasts mainly mainstream Hollywood movies. The channel frequently has themed nights or seasons in which a number of films centred around one genre, director or actor are shown. As Channel 4 also owns a film production company, Film4 Productions, it shows many of its in-house productions.





25 01 2011

Exhibition (7th to the 21st of January)

 

1 (2) True Grit Paramount Pictures Western $14,605,135 -40.18% 3,124 $4,675 $110,035,157 19
2 (1) Little Fockers Universal Comedy $13,487,245 -47.66% 3,675 $3,670 $123,687,760 19
3 (new) Season of the Witch Relativity Thriller/Suspense $10,612,375 2,816 $3,769 $10,612,375 3
4 (3) Tron: Legacy Walt Disney Pictures Drama $10,090,002 -46.21% 3,013 $3,349 $148,212,420 24
5 (8) Black Swan Fox Searchlight Thriller/Suspense $8,113,011 -8.65% 1,584 $5,122 $61,218,504 38
6 (43) Country Strong Sony Pictures Drama $7,326,165 +17,550.86% 1,424 $5,145 $7,463,454 17
7 (6) The Fighter Paramount Pictures Drama $7,001,504 -30.02% 2,528 $2,770 $57,845,946 31
8 (4) Yogi Bear 3D Warner Bros. Adventure $6,641,250 -46.38% 3,288 $2,020 $75,436,771 24
9 (9) The King’s Speech Weinstein Co. Drama $6,414,407 -17.50% 758 $8,462 $32,896,665 45
10 (re-entry) Tangled Walt Disney Pictures Adventure $5,111,098 2,383 $2,145 $175,779,496 47
1 (new) The Green Hornet Sony Pictures Action $33,526,876 3,584 $9,355 $33,526,876 3
2 (new) The Dilemma Universal Comedy $17,816,230 2,940 $6,060 $17,816,230 3
3 (1) True Grit Paramount Pictures Western $11,004,755 -24.65% 3,459 $3,181 $126,216,650 26
4 (9) The King’s Speech Weinstein Co. Drama $9,186,203 +43.21% 1,543 $5,953 $44,710,062 52
5 (5) Black Swan Fox Searchlight Thriller/Suspense $8,342,648 +2.83% 2,328 $3,584 $73,211,006 45
6 (2) Little Fockers Universal Comedy $7,194,865 -46.65% 3,394 $2,120 $134,280,890 26
7 (4) Tron: Legacy Walt Disney Pictures Drama $5,679,858 -43.71% 2,439 $2,329 $156,918,454 31
8 (8) Yogi Bear 3D Warner Bros. Adventure $5,365,547 -19.21% 2,702 $1,986 $82,115,619 31
9 (7) The Fighter Paramount Pictures Drama $5,101,140 -27.14% 2,414 $2,113 $65,745,804 38
10 (3) Season of the Witch Relativity Thriller/Suspense $4,606,584 -56.59% 2,827 $1,629 $18,104,324 10
1 (new) No Strings Attached Paramount Pictures Romantic Comedy $19,652,921 3,018 $6,512 $19,652,921 3
2 (1) The Green Hornet Sony Pictures Action $17,677,565 -47.27% 3,584 $4,932 $63,018,808 10
3 (2) The Dilemma Universal Comedy $9,108,890 -48.87% 2,943 $3,095 $32,746,225 10
4 (4) The King’s Speech Weinstein Co. Drama $7,854,910 -14.49% 1,680 $4,676 $57,313,881 59
5 (3) True Grit Paramount Pictures Western $7,330,092 -33.39% 3,464 $2,116 $137,963,519 33
6 (5) Black Swan Fox Searchlight Thriller/Suspense $5,869,744 -29.64% 2,407 $2,439 $83,250,375 52
7 (6) Little Fockers Universal Comedy $4,320,090 -39.96% 2,979 $1,450 $141,111,705 33
8 (9) The Fighter Paramount Pictures Drama $4,164,504 -18.36% 2,275 $1,831 $72,680,740 45
9 (8) Yogi Bear 3D Warner Bros. Adventure $3,819,395 -28.82% 2,510 $1,522 $88,649,598 38
10 (7) Tron: Legacy Walt Disney Pictures Drama $3,647,121 -35.79% 2,018 $1,807 $163,206,611 38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





25 01 2011

Oscar Films & Blockbusters!

 

Oscar films are films that are made to win oscars awards. Oscars are hard to market, this could be down to a number of  reasons, out of the ordinary storylines and genres, the actors in the film and so on. Oscar films are aimed at niche audiences and even though they are called oscar films doesnt mean they have won an oscar, it is a type of film that is aimed at the oscar awards. In england an oscar film has to be released before the end of the year to qualify for the nominations. When the oscar films are released they are usualy platform released so that they are still in the cinema when the oscar nominations are announced and the oscars have been awarded.

 

Million Dollar Baby is an oscar film that won 4 oscars in 2005, ‘Best Achievement in Directing’ ‘Best Motion Picture of The Year’ ‘Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role’  ‘Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role’ it was also nominated for 3 other nominations. It was released on the  15th December 2004, a typical time for the oscars to be released (In America). This was only a limited release, the expansion to wide release was on the 21st January 2005 Million Dollar Baby would have made a lot of money in its opening weekend, but then gone town typically, and shot back up when it one its oscars. The film was released using platform release to ensure it was still in the cinemas at the time of the oscar awards.

Weekend Chart Record

Date Rank Gross % Change Theaters Per Theater Total Gross Days
12/17/2004 24 $179,953 8 $22,494 $235,407 5
12/24/2004 26 $189,597 +5.36% 9 $21,066 $527,138 12
12/31/2004 27 $271,472 +43.18% 9 $30,164 $1,044,149 19
1/7/2005 15 $1,920,418 +607.41% 109 $17,619 $3,107,704 26
1/14/2005 14 $1,813,881 -5.55% 122 $14,868 $5,684,881 33
1/21/2005 12 $1,652,078 -8.92% 147 $11,239 $8,312,424 40
1/28/2005 3 $12,265,482 +642.43% 2,010 $6,102 $21,579,631 47
2/4/2005 5 $8,515,365 -30.57% 2,025 $4,205 $34,436,002 54
2/11/2005 4 $7,447,212 -12.54% 2,035 $3,660 $44,948,277 61
2/18/2005 5 $6,810,065 -8.56% 2,105 $3,235 $54,313,587 68
2/25/2005 6 $7,344,390 +7.85% 2,125 $3,456 $64,851,738 75
3/4/2005 5 $8,135,421 +10.77% 2,350 $3,462 $76,600,008 82
3/11/2005 6 $5,153,356 -36.66% 2,375 $2,170 $84,054,207 89
3/18/2005 8 $4,021,437 -21.96% 2,210 $1,820 $89,943,692 96
3/25/2005 10 $2,587,313 -35.66% 1,710 $1,513 $94,133,278 103
4/1/2005 12 $1,466,429 -43.32% 1,405 $1,044 $96,662,363 110
4/8/2005 14 $702,019 -52.13% 857 $819 $97,825,712 117
4/15/2005 17 $628,184 -10.52% 902 $696 $98,708,641 124
4/22/2005 21 $309,289 -50.76% 455 $680 $99,252,599 131
4/29/2005 26 $174,793 -43.49% 235 $744 $99,527,252 138
5/6/2005 22 $260,338 +48.94% 390 $668 $99,851,398 145
5/13/2005 24 $188,348 -27.65% 345 $546 $100,156,381 152
5/20/2005 34 $80,427 -57.30% 110 $731 $100,283,719 159
5/27/2005 36 $49,447 -38.52% 75 $659 $100,368,397 166
6/3/2005 43 $26,834 -45.73% 59 $455 $100,422,786 173

Opposite to this a blockbuster franchise such as the Harry Potter films don’t need to rely on the oscar awards and nominations to make money, their easy to market, well known and also pre sold. Harry Potter films are also family films which is a massive cause for their success.

Weekend Chart Record

Date Rank Gross % Change Theaters Per Theater Total Gross Days
7/13/2007 1 $77,108,414 4,285 $17,995 $139,715,157 5
7/20/2007 2 $32,511,350 -57.84% 4,285 $7,587 $207,866,865 12
7/27/2007 3 $17,733,085 -45.46% 4,005 $4,428 $242,439,214 19
8/3/2007 5 $9,522,220 -46.30% 3,125 $3,047 $261,027,397 26
8/10/2007 8 $5,432,130 -42.95% 2,585 $2,101 $272,047,388 33
8/17/2007 9 $3,656,379 -32.69% 1,955 $1,870 $278,762,117 40
8/24/2007 12 $2,402,412 -34.30% 1,322 $1,817 $283,230,934 47
8/31/2007 13 $1,893,258 -21.19% 1,017 $1,862 $286,143,377 54
9/7/2007 15 $1,031,339 -45.53% 775 $1,331 $288,201,180 61
9/14/2007 15 $803,227 -22.12% 589 $1,364 $289,326,081 68
9/21/2007 27 $328,427 -59.11% 320 $1,026 $289,855,714 75
9/28/2007 27 $229,779 -30.04% 241 $953 $290,175,378 82
10/5/2007 28 $363,449 +58.17% 408 $891 $290,598,256 89
10/12/2007 34 $287,874 -20.79% 377 $764 $291,041,408 96
10/19/2007 33 $208,306 -27.64% 283 $736 $291,340,445 103
10/26/2007 35 $147,780 -29.06% 225 $657 $291,551,968 110
11/2/2007 35 $107,293 -27.40% 159 $675 $291,704,500 117
11/9/2007 40 $78,855 -26.50% 105 $751 $291,808,642 124
11/16/2007 41 $50,740 -35.65% 90 $564 $291,880,420 131
11/23/2007 44 $46,634 -8.09% 56 $833 $291,946,208 138
11/30/2007 48 $23,034 -50.61% 52 $443 $291,980,108 145
12/7/2007 64 $10,274 -55.40% 38 $270 $292,000,866 152




31 10 2010

 

I am basing my movie star profile on Jim Carey, an a list movie star that appeals to different audiences, comedy as his main audience but also thriller/horrror movies.

The big movie that established Jim Carey was Ace Ventura : Pet Detective (April 1994) making $72,217,000, he played a goofy detective specializing in animals going in search of a missing dolphin mascot of a football team. It’s all a little bit silly and unlikely but that is what Jim Carey fans expect from him now after Ace Ventura and Dumb and Dumber, two of the most famous Carey films, Dumb and Dumber making $127,175,354 (USA).

After Dumb and Dumber Carey made many more comedys such as The Cable Guy, Liar Liar, Me, Myself & Irene and How the Grinch Stole Christmas (The Grinch) he plays many diffrent characters in these films, a lonely and disturbed cable guy, a fast track lawyer who can’t lie for 24 hours, a nice-guy cop with dissociative identity disorder and a creature intent on stealing Christmas. Even though all these characters are very distinctively different, we always expected him to be hilarious and he didn’t dissapoint. Even though Carey is known for his comedy some of these films have a different genre also such as The Cable Guy which portrays quite a dark comedy and sometimes has quite a seriousness to it but it works with the film and I think its one of his best. Also Me, Myself and Irene has a dark side to it but not a seriousness so it is sort of similar to The Cable Guy but not the seriousness to it. Liar Liar and The Grinch also have quite a seriousness but in an emotional way, Liar Liar shows the connection between father and son and The Grinch shows the relationship between everyone and Christmas. A lot of Careys films have a message to send for example Liar Liar which shows us to value our children and marriage.

In 2003 Carey played Bruce Nolan, a guy who complains about God too often is given almighty powers to teach him how difficult it is to run the world in the comedy Bruce Almighty, a huge success making a gross of $242,589,580 and is now one of Careys most well known films. He made a few more films after this then made The Number 23 in 2007 which was a big shock as it was totally out of character for Carey, he plays Walter Sparrow, a man who becomes obsessed with a novel that he believes was written about him. As his obsession increases, more and more similarities seem to arise. It is a very complex movie which contrasts with the comedies, easy to understand that e normally does. However it was a great film and has made millions.

More recently he has made two very successful movies, Yes Man (2008) and I Love you, Phillip Morris (2009) which were more in his character as comedies.

The reason we like Jim Carey so much is because there’s no one like him, and unlike a lot of actors we can tell that Carey improvises a lot of his own acting as we see his character portrayed into different films. His childish humour brings our immaturity back and for some reason it just works, there hasn’t been many Carey films that havent been a big hit and we can always trust that he will deliver a great performance, his reputation can get people into the cinema on his appearence in a film alone and to do that shows he is an incredible actor.

 





Hello world!

27 09 2010

WANTED (2008)

Features actors, Angelina Jolie, James McAvoy, Terence Stamp and Morgan Freeman. Released 2008, bringing in $50,927,085 in the first weekend. The poster is clearly an action film, we know this from the dangerous looking poster, it shows us the genre straight away. The poster is a little dull when thinking about information it gives us, however the initial image we see is quite interesting so maybe they didn’t believe they needed to write a lot of information to get us interested. If it was a plainer image then the producers would have probably wanted Angelina’s name on the poster as she is a well-known actress. The ‘WANTED’ title is in block capitals, this mimics a real wanted poster and gives the poster a mood of danger as if someone potentially harmful is on the loose. From the image of the two actors I get an instant feel that Angelina is the character with more power, the action of holding a gun upwards is normally portrayed as a powerful act, contrasting with James McAvoy as he holds the gun downwards and more defensively , this suggests he is less powerful and a little nervous. Also Angelina is higher up in position compared to James, this gives her more power also as it seems like she is looking down on him. Angelina has a lot of tattoos all the way down her arm, they aren’t feminine tattoos either which shows she isn’t as girly as other women and isn’t afraid of pain. The tattoos make her seem very mysterious as we cannot read that they say as they are in different languages and symbols that not everyone can understand.  The facial expressions of the two characters show they are very serious about whatever they are about to do as they have a look on their face that suggest anger, revenge or just dedication to their work maybe. The pair also look professional as they are holding their guns in a way they seem used to and the guns look expensive and very powerful, especially Angelina’s, which again suggests she is more powerful.

 

TRAILER

http://www.youtube.com/v/5uMlNKozweg?fs=1&hl=en_GB

 

PHOTO SHOTS FROM TRAILER



The trailer above I think is quite bad as you know the whole storyline after watching it, you can tell all the best bits are in the trailer by watching it once as the scenes that are shown look very well crafted, trailers like these look like they have picked out all the best scenes, put them together and added music. They give you way too much information which ruins the film because when you go to watch it you’ve already seen the best bits.  I think what makes a good trailer is picking little bits of the best scenes out but not showing all of it, also not giving away the characters too much as in this trailer we know that James McAvoy starts of shy then develops by meeting Angelina Jolie, it’s too obvious and people want to go to the cinema to find out what happens in the film not to reminisce on the trailer. However, it does seem to be able to persuade its target audience as it looks action packed and i think the action and Angelina lovers would definitely go see this film. The trailer represents Angelina just like the poster does, tough and a little masculine but not in appearance, just in mannerisms, Angelina is clearly an attractive women and having her in the movie will attract the lads who want to see a bit of flesh. Near to the end of the trailer she appears naked from the waist upwards which would get the audience to go see the movie as they might think they’ll see more. Sex appeal can get a lot of people to the cinema when its a very famous actor.

 

This movie poster is quite creative as it presents the images sort of like a storyboard, this is a good way of advertising a movie because you can get a lot of images all into one poster. This poster is a lot more informative than the first ^^^. This one tells us the actors names and shows photos of more than just the main two stars. I think this is a better way of advertising the film rather than the trailer because this way your showing a lot of the action but not too much as they are only still pictures whereas in the trailer they showed big chunks of the scenes which ruins the film for you. This poster is in the same style as the first one, gold, bronze and black colours, which comes across as sexy and dangerous to match Angelina Jolie. She is perceived as a tough women again in this poster as she has a gun in a lot of the shots and her facial expression in most photos is brave and powerful.

 

Conclusion

To conclude i think that the advertisement for this film has been good and bad, i think the trailer gives away way too much information and ruins the film a little but the posters are very well made and give us an idea about what the film is about but not giving away too much. Both posters show an attractive women on the front so that it appeals to the males aswell as just action fans. I think the second poster is better than the first not only because there’s a range of pictures and more information but also because it shows Morgan Freeman on it and the first poster does not. I think by putting Morgan Freeman on the poster, it will attract an even wider audience because not only have you got the attractive women, the attractive man, and action, but you also have Morgan Freeman on this one, another star which a lot of audiences like. The more different genres and actors you represent on a poster the wider your audience will get, in most circumstances. Overall I think the posters are very well displayed and would definitely attract me to watch the film, but the trailer was quite a let down.